Robert Ballantyne, Psy.D.
As a therapist and supervisor, I work to create a safe, non-judgmental environment to facilitate authenticity and open exploration. I have a foundation in contemporary psychodynamic theory but also rely upon an integration of multicultural, feminist, developmental, and systemic lenses in my approach to develop a holistic and contextual view of clients. I also integrate CBT and DBT interventions to aid in skill building and use the therapy relationship as a tool to build interpersonal self-awareness. I tailor my supervisory interventions to trainee developmental needs/learning styles and use humor where appropriate. I am sensitive to power dynamics and work to share power in the room for trainees to find their own voice. I also greatly value self-reflection and encourage exploration of self in supervision to strengthen self-awareness and clinical effectiveness.
Jenna Bauer, Psy.D.
I take an integrative approach in working with clients. While looking through a multicultural lens, I address the interpersonal dynamics at play while bringing in mindfulness, CBT and DBT skills if needed. I view the therapeutic relationship as the foundation for growth and change, and thus I strive to create a safe, nurturing environment where therapist and client can work together. Similarly, I feel that creating a safe and supportive supervisory relationship is key to the growth of a supervisee. I seek to make supervisees feel comfortable enough to process both successes and challenges in their work, as well as the dynamics of the supervisory relationship. I meet supervisees where they are at and balance guidance with collaboration and space for self-exploration. Supervision is a process where both parties are constantly learning and growing, and I feel honored by the opportunity to help a supervisee on their path towards developing their own style as a therapist.
Niccole Brusa, Psy.D.
When approaching my work as both a psychologist and a supervisor, I keep the three tenants of connection, collaboration, and community as the framework from which I operate. My clinical approach is integrative with a foundation in humanistic, multicultural, cognitive-behavioral, and systemic theories. I believe that it is essential to establish a safe space where clients and supervisees alike feel supported as they navigate through their own growth and challenges. As a supervisor, I aspire to explore and cultivate what is unique about every clinician-in-training and to help build a distinct voice as a psychologist. Through collaboration and community, I aim to move towards maximum clinical effectiveness by providing developmentally appropriate challenges while considering interpersonal, cultural, and systemic dynamics. I openly welcome the mutual learning opportunities presented by the continued development of a clinician-in-training and consider it a privilege to be a part of this evolution.
Azadeh Fatemi, Ph.D.
In my clinical work I draw from interpersonal, experiential, and multicultural approaches. I use CBT to help clients develop skills, and better understand their thoughts and feelings. I view relationship as a powerful tool for change. Using the therapeutic relationship, I try to create a safe and supportive environment for clients, and tailor my approach to their needs. My approach to supervision is very collaborative, developmental, and relational. In supervision, I value the supervisory relationship, and invest in developing and exploring this relationship from the beginning. I also value the diverse cultural identities and experiences that supervisor and supervisee bring to the supervisory relationship and try to attend to how the intersectionality of identities impact supervision and clinical work. As a supervisor, I try to see where my supervisees are and help them achieve their potentials. Collaboration is the core in my supervision, and I try to collaboratively create experiences within the supervision session so that my supervisee can reflect and grow through the experience. Finally, I try to create a balance between providing support and challenge in supervision, and value my supervisee’s feedback in this process.
Joe Hermes, Ph.D.
I began my clinical training heavily influenced by my psychodynamic mentors and consider myself to practice an informed eclecticism; client and therapist in a dyadic relationship as influenced by internal and external systems with personal and practical resources brought to bear on symptom relief, recognition of strengths, and further interpersonal development. My hope for a supervision process is that it is an ongoing relationship of recognizing development and developmental needs and supporting, encouraging, and acknowledging change toward greater knowledge, skill, and clinical success.
Mirka Ivanovic, Psy.D.
As a clinician, I am committed to understanding the unique cultural, relational and contextual factors that constrain, empower, and challenge a person’s attempts to engage in life meaningfully. I approach my work with a deep respect for a person’s capacity to change, and prioritize the development of a collaborative, honest therapeutic relationship based in mutual respect and committed action. I draw upon perspectives rooted in relational, existential and feminist theories, while incorporating mindfulness-based interventions into my work, with a particular focus on self-compassion. I aspire to infuse my supervisory encounters with similar values, by emphasizing the establishment of a supervisory relationship that is collaborative, safe and transparent, while considering the unique developmental factors particular to the clinician in training. I enter supervisory encounters curious about not only the clinician in training but also the person in the room, and strive to create a space where a trainee can celebrate successes, confront challenges and move towards professional integration of cultural, personal and professional identities
Chuck La Chance, Psy.D.
My approach to therapy is integrative with a primary foundation in cognitive behavioral theory along with systemic, multicultural, and relational perspectives. I approach supervision from a developmental perspective, acknowledging the supervisee’s strengths and current skills and working collaboratively to identify the supervisee’s goals and interests for training and professional development. In keeping with my approach to therapy, I consider supervision to be a collaborative, respectful process, and strive to provide an atmosphere for supervision that is safe and supportive. My goal during supervision is to provide a balance of supporting and appropriately challenging the supervisee in a way that will promote the development of individual strengths while addressing areas for growth in clinical skills.
Caroline Lavelock, Ph.D.
My approach to therapy is largely informed by psychodynamic theory, but I also integrate conceptualizations and techniques from ACT and DBT. I also have a research background in studying positive psychology and find myself at times integrating concepts from areas of forgiveness, cultural humility, flow, positive emotions, strengths-based approaches, etc. I believe the therapeutic relationship and expression of core affect within that relationship are the major agents of change in therapy, and similarly, I find an open and supportive supervisory relationship to be the foundation of significant growth and development for trainees. I supervise trainees using both attachment and developmentally-based approaches, and I focus on creating a safe space where trainees don’t have to be perfect in order to learn. I like to focus on interpersonal and cultural dynamics both in therapy and in supervision, where parallel processes, transference, and countertransference can be examined to produce insight and change. I also especially enjoy providing training in group therapy.
Karen Maddi, Ph.D.
My primary theoretical approach is psychodynamic/interpersonal with additional emphasis on socio-cultural context and feminist perspectives. I have a strong generalist background but am also experienced in working with individuals suffering from trauma, PTSD or eating disorders and can be equally comfortable working with a pragmatic symptom management of disruptive symptoms. I prefer to take a developmentally-based approach working collaboratively with trainees to identifying and work on individualized goals for professional development.
Dia Anjali Mason, Ph.D.
My work is informed by a multicultural and feminist framework and grounded in an interpersonal process approach. I believe the therapeutic relationship is the basis for healing and attend to transference and countertransference in my work. I also integrate DBT to support development of coping skills when needed. As a supervisor, I use a developmental approach and am attuned to the impact of identities, power dynamics, and parallel processes within the supervisor-supervisee dyad. I value self-awareness and vulnerability and encourage self-reflection to foster growth.
Belva A. Miles, Psy.D.
My approach to therapy is integrative with a foundation in cognitive behavioral therapy and techniques from ACT and DBT. However, in my work the needs of the client guide my treatment. I am flexible and able to identify when there is a need to utilize more psychodynamic approaches to assist clients in identifying unconscious defenses and unhealthy relational patterns. I strive to develop a collaborative relationship with my clients so they feel comfortable in discovering, disclosing, and working through troubling issues. I am respectful of each client’s individual experience and am extremely sensitive to multicultural and systemic factors that may impede achievement of academic, career, and personal goals. In terms of supervision, I strive to create a supportive atmosphere where trainees are able to explore and identify their strengths and growth areas. I assist trainees in developing and refining their skillset through the use of developmentally appropriate challenges. I encourage trainees to utilize a broad lens with the consideration multicultural and systemic factors when conceptualizing and treating clients.
Jeanette Simon, Psy.D.
My approach to therapy is integrative with a primary foundation in psychodynamic/interpersonal theory and systemic, feminist, and multicultural perspectives. As a supervisor (in many ways similar to my approach as a therapist), I believe an essential part of my role is to create an environment where trainees feel understood and supported. I approach supervision from a developmental perspective, looking at where at a supervisee is at and mutually identifying training and professional development interests, needs and goals. I strive to seek a balance of supporting and appropriately challenging and value having an open and collaborative relationship.
Kurt Stevens, Psy.D.
While my primary theoretical orientation is strongly influenced by psychodynamic theories (e.g., object relations, attachment, self-psychology, ego-psychology, and contemporary relational) within a multicultural framework, I generally utilize an interpersonal/relational treatment approach in which I continually strive to foster an authentic and trusting therapeutic alliance in which clients feel validated, understood, and safe to identify and explore their emotions, thoughts, and underlying motivations in greater depth. Similarly, as a supervisor, I use a relational and collaborative style in order to create a safe and supportive space in which I attempt to meet supervisees where they are both in a particular moment during supervision as well as from a broader, developmental perspective. I view the opportunity to serve as a supervisor as a privilege and aspire to create a mutually enjoyable and rewarding supervisory experience. I also aim to seek an appropriate balance between giving positive feedback, providing guidance, offering appropriate challenges, and exploring supervisee’s emerging reactions associated with both their client-therapist and supervisor-supervisee relational experiences, all in the context of an open, supportive, and collaborative supervisory relationship.
Johanna Strokoff, Ph.D.
My clinical approach incorporates psychodynamic, interpersonal, and multicultural perspectives, with a strong focus on using the client-therapist relationship to model healthy connections with oneself and others. Further, valuing the power of emotions to gain a better understanding of clients’ internal experiences, I incorporate Affect Phobia (housed within psychodynamic theory) techniques to help clients express and gain awareness about painful, often suppressed affect. During supervision, I greatly value utilizing theory to guide clinical interventions and find it exciting to join supervisees in their journey to further advance and solidify their therapeutic orientations. Given my experiential style as a clinician, I aspire to provide a safe environment for supervisees to explore their emotional reactions to clients as a source of valuable data regarding their clients’ interpersonal patterns and to gain awareness of potential dynamics within the therapeutic dyad. Finally, I try to model a supervision experience that aligns with what I have found helpful throughout my training career, which includes a balance of establishing a challenging, yet supportive space, where supervisees are encouraged to take risks and develop their authentic voices as clinicians.